> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://sexytrees.savimbo.com/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://sexytrees.savimbo.com/biodiversity-credits.md).

# Biodiversity credits from agroforestry systems

<mark style="color:violet;">TL:DR = The biodiversity crediting layer is experimental; we'll keep this page updated real-time.</mark>

Biodiversity credits from uplift or restoration protocols currently average $300/unit ([Paynter et al. 2024](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381459737)). We know high-quality agroforestry systems (AFS) are reliably associated with greater biodiversity than monoculture crops ([Scales and Marsden 2008](https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892908004840); [Martello et al. 2024](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121592)).  Therefore, financial systems meant to fairly compensate them would reliably incorporate crediting in the [biodiversity dimension](/foundations/orthogonal-stacking.md).&#x20;

However, this is not a simple proposition. These credits take an [average of two years to generate](https://unit.savimbo.com/time#longer-term-projects), lack standardization (see [Current science](/biodiversity-credits/calculation.md#the-current-state-of-the-science)), and biodiversity credits are a frontier market (see [Frontier Market](/foundations/orthogonal-stacking.md#nature-markets-are-emerging-markets) ).&#x20;

This layer of the protocol is experimental. We have done a thorough review and concluded that our [environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding](/biodiversity-credits/calculation.md#edna-as-a-measurement-approach) is the only metric our group can truly get behind.  But we would not choose an emerging technology if there was anything else reasonably available.&#x20;

This tool is not standardized (see [Calculation](/biodiversity-credits/calculation.md)).  It lacks basic science and market data that would inform its unit economics for projects. We also need to generate reasonable statistical parameters from the related methodology. It also lacks reference libraries widely across biodiverse zones. &#x20;

Currently, we can only describe the [most accurate theoretical protocol](/biodiversity-credits/calculation.md) and our sampling methodology to prove it in real-world piloting (see [Water Bucket Protocol](/biodiversity-credits/water-bucket-protocol.md)) with the caveat that costs are likely still prohibitive ($200/sample + unknown number of samples to reach scientific certainty).&#x20;

We conclude uplift biodiversity credits are not currently economically feasible at the 1-ha scale, but could be feasible if projects reach a bigger area or have paired academic research funding.&#x20;

In the interim, SexyTrees can be planted and measured around more tangible methods, [trees planted,](/tree-credits.md) and [biochar sequestered](/carbon-credits.md). This is easy access to the market, already has a sales pipeline, and is more forgiving in terms of scientific accuracy.&#x20;

Next steps and theoretical basis for the updating protocol follow.&#x20;

<br>

{% columns %}
{% column %}
{% content-ref url="/pages/UaKYJCH79Umqc7392lzy" %}
[Biodiversity unit](/biodiversity-credits/biodiversity-unit.md)
{% endcontent-ref %}

{% endcolumn %}

{% column %}
{% content-ref url="/pages/qjpo9j7t2EpJM7cwl9BV" %}
[Biodiversity calculation](/biodiversity-credits/calculation.md)
{% endcontent-ref %}
{% endcolumn %}

{% column %}
{% content-ref url="/pages/hWjImJXjXoydiFvxDeh5" %}
[Water Bucket Protocol](/biodiversity-credits/water-bucket-protocol.md)
{% endcontent-ref %}
{% endcolumn %}
{% endcolumns %}


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:

```
GET https://sexytrees.savimbo.com/biodiversity-credits.md?ask=<question>&goal=<endgoal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.