Authors, experts, fieldwork, contributors, acknowledgements
Document authors, contributors, and Indigenous advisors
Authorship of this methodology has been difficult to assign properly, as many contributors have worked on different aspects of the design. We have opted for a formal scientific authorship list, a contributor listing, and a piloting practitioner list — as we feel the grassroots practitioners have contributed significantly by proving the model in practice, even if they never participated in writing.
It is important to use it to demonstrate equitable and accurate authorship of scientific work. But, in the case of this methodology, it was quite difficult, as there were so many disciplines, contributors, and even definitions of 'science'. For clarity and credit, we've opted for the following approach.
Multicategory authorship
Authors fall into one or more of four categories:
Direct authors of the methodology as per traditional academic criteria.
Indigenous or local leaders who are practitioners, field experts and piloting sites, advising on the practice guide, informing methodology creation by application and piloting feedback, or independently teaching its core tenets.
Collaborators and acknowledgements, including multidisciplinary scientists, practitioners, experts, and peers. Some of whom do not endorse this work, but provided foundational scientific work.
Reviewers who have publicly commented on or otherwise informed its development without direct endorsement
Notes on authorship:
This methodology has been informed by exposure to traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) from several Indigenous groups, but is not directly attributable to one group in particular. We have chosen to cite individual contributing Indigenous advisors below, and removed any plant knowledge that may require Nagoya protocols.
In some ways, funders are authors, as what gets funded gets produced. In that spirit, Naturatech LAC quite obviously contributed funding, peer support, applied science advising, and went far beyond traditional funders in that regard. Their funders, BID Labs Colombia made this possible. Additional research was funded by Bioversity/CIAT and the Institute of Plant Sciences.
This is a living document and the author list is expected to expand as the methodology is intentionally stacked, different authors might work on different layers. We've outlinked to component layers where possible.
Direct methodology authors
Authors listed in alphabetical order. Included according to compliance with ICMJE authorship/contributorship criteria. Note: given the scope of the topics in the methodology, we are using a contributor/guaranteur model and including authors who contributed substantial writing and/or intellectual basis for core content.
Anja Hutschenreiter
Species Monitoring Specialist Group, IUCN
Scientific writing, financial innovation, project managment
CSO at Savimbo during drafting of version 1.1 and led writing of version 1.0 (Yale book chapter)
CEO, Savimbo
Scientific writing, financial innovation, project managment
Full methodology
Kristy Deiner
SimplexDNA
WBP inception, scientific writing
Co-author of version 1.0 (Yale book chapter)
Matteo Dell'Acqua
Researcher, Institute of Plant Sciences, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
Research grant, WBP field testing, scientific writing
Co-author of version 1.0 (Yale book chapter)
Santiago Romero Garcia
Ecology, Savimbo
Field testing, scientific writing
Full methodology
Sara Verni
Researcher, Institute of Plant Sciences, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
Research grant, WBP field testing, scientific writing
Co-author of version 1.0 (Yale book chapter)
IDsov input, grassroots agroforestry insights, scientific writing
Contributor to version 1.0 (Yale book chapter), Co-author and designer of eDNA contract, piloting site negotiator
Note: All contributing authors for an academic citation have been included according to ICMJE authorship/contributorship criteria. However, we find these criteria to be insufficient for the type of work this methodology represents.
Practitioners, field experts, and piloting sites
Indigenous nations are listed if applicable.
Equipo, Conservacion Internacional
Colombia
Puerto Guzman
Community negotiations, systematic academic agroforestry installations.
REFA (Ecuadorian Analog Forestry Network)
Ecuador
Community negotiations, Field-based scientific feedback. Authentic agroforestry profiders.
Director, Observatorio Sacha Kamayuk
Ecuador
Marcapata, Ecuador
Agroforestry science, Inga protocols, grassroots economics and community negotiations
María Pastora Juajibioy Chindoy
Colombia, Kamëntsá (Camsá)
Sibundoy, Putumayo
Miguel Chindoy
Colombia, Kamëntsá (Camsá)
Sibundoy, Putumayo
Piloting site for Indigenous chagra protocol. Authorship above.
Collaborators
Technical advisors and negotiators are listed in alphabetical order. Contributed intellectually to the work without meeting formal ICMJE authorship/contributorship criteria. Note: there are strong debates in various fields as to some of the technical decisions in this protocol, and contributors should not be assumed to endorse all aspects of the protocol, which is extensive and multidisciplinary.
Senior Scientist Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Scientific advisory on agroforestry, agrobiodiversity, grassroots economics, and eDNA
Indigenous, Savimbo
Indigenous practitioners, FPIC principles and practice, rights, and TEK science and data sovereignty
Ecuador pilot sites, technical advising on Inga Alley Cropping
Below-canopy forest monitoring, LiDAR in Carbon credits layer, general top-level nerding 🤓
Acknowledgements
In alphabetical order. This methodology builds on fundamental science, and independent groups who do not necessarily endorse its findings or agree with its decisions, but whose feedback or independent work was influential in its content, or provided structural support or comparison models.
Advising on grassroots agroforestry experiences, and introduction to authentic grassroots providers.
C-Minds and NaturaTech
Innovative financing structures, strategy, scientific, technical, and economics advising
Eniel David Cruz
Researcher Eastern Amazon, Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, Belém, Pará
Author of the 2021 Embrapa technical communication on Inga edulis germination. Advising on germination and planting sections.
Florencia Montagnini and Luke Schubert
Program in Tropical Forestry and Agroforestry
Yale School of the Environment
Chapter editorial and academic refinement
Fundamental and basic science on Inga Alley Cropping. Note: does not endorse Savimbo's per-tree payment model.
Competing Interests
Human Subjects Statement: No human subjects were involved in this research.
Funding and Support: This research was financially supported by grant funding from Institute of Plant Sciences, funding from NaturaTech LAC, Savimbo Inc., and contributions by its authors. Note: The article contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the affiliated or sponsoring institutions.
Conflict of Interest: Savimbo Inc. is a social enterprise that sells biodiversity credits and has a biodiversity methodology that sometimes earns royalties when other people use it. Andrea Burbank is the CEO of Savimbo, Jhony Lopez and Fernando Lezama are cofounders, Anja Hutschenreiter, and Santiago Garcia have been employed by Savimbo. The other authors have no competing interests.
Last updated
Was this helpful?